GREEK PHILOSOPHY BEGINNINGS:
GREEK
PHILOSOPHY BEGINNINGS:
Early philosophers
sought the basic ingredients of the world we live in and posed the following
question: At a fundamental level is the
world made out of water, or air, or fire, or earth, or a combination of some/
all of these or something else entirely?
ELEMENTALISTS:
(NATURAL THEOLOGY)
THALES:
Only two sayings are
recorded of Thales of Miletus, traditionally the founding father of Greek
philosophy.
1.
They illustrate the mixrure of science and religion[1],
a.
for one of them was
‘All things are full of gods’,
b.
and the other was ‘Water is the first principle of everything’.
Even in antiquity people found it hard to understand Thales’ adoption of water as the ultimate principle of explanation
a.
The earth, he said, rested on water like a log floating
in a stream—but then, asked Aristotle, what does the water rest on?
b.
He went further and said that everything came from
and was in some sense made out of water.
c.
Again, his reasons were obscure, and Aristotle could
only conjecture that it was because all animals and plants need water to live,
or because semen is moist.
ANAXIMENES:
Anaximenes opted,
like Thales, for a single one of the existing elements as fundamental, though
again he opted for air rather than water.
1.
In its stable state air is invisible, but when it is
moved and condensed it becomes first wind and then cloud and then water, and finally
water condensed becomes mud and stone.
2. Rarefied air
became fire, thus completing the extent of the elements.
3. In this way
rarefaction and condensation can conjure everything out of the underlying air.
4.
In support of this claim Anaximenes appealed to
experience, and indeed to experiment—an experiment that the reader can easily
carry out for herself.
a.
Blow on your hand, first with the lips pursed, and
then from an open mouth: the first time the air will feel cold, and the second
time hot.
b.
This, argued Anaximenes, shows the connection
between density and temperature.
XENOPHANES:
Like the Milesians,
Xenophanes propounded a cosmology.
1.
The basic element, he maintained, was not water nor
air, but earth, and the earth reaches down below us to infinity.
2.
‘All things are from earth and in earth all things
end’
HERACLITUS:
Heraclitus once said
that the world was an ever-living Fire: sea and earth are the ashes of this
perpetual bonfire.
1.
Fire is like gold: you can exchange gold for all
kinds of goods, and Fire can turn into any of the elements.
2. This fiery
world is the only world there is, not made by gods or men, but governed
throughout by Logos.
a. This universal Logos, Heraclitus says, is hard to grasp and most men never succeed in doing so.a. By comparison with someone who has woken up to the Logos, they are like sleepers curled up in their own dream-world instead of facing up to the single, universal truth.
b.
Humans fall into three classes, at various removes
from the rational Fire that governs the universe:
i. A
philosopher like Heraclitus is closest to the Fiery Logos and receives most
warmth from it;
ii. next,
ordinary people when awake draw light from it when they use their own reasoning
powers;
iii. Finally,
those who are asleep have the windows of their soul blocked up and keep contact
with nature only through their breathing.
c.
Diogenes Laertius tells us that the sequence:
i. Fire–air–water–earth
is the road downward,
ii. Earth– water–air–fire
is the road upward.
iii. These two
roads can only be regarded as the same if they are seen as two stages on a
continuous, everlasting, cosmic progress.
d.
Heraclitus did indeed believe that the cosmic fire
went through stages of kindling and quenching.
e. The underlying process has no beginning and no end, but each cycle of kindling and quenching is an individual world that comes into and goes out of existence.EMPEDOCLES:
Empedocles’
philosophy of nature can be regarded, from one point of view, as a synthesis of
the thought of the Ionian philosophers. As we have seen, each of them had
singled out some one substance as the basic or dominant stuff of the universe:
1.
Thales had privileged water, Anaximenes air, Xenophanes
earth, and Heraclitus fire.
2. For
Empedocles all four of these substances stood on equal terms as the fundamental
ingredients, or ‘roots’ as he put it, of the universe.
3. These roots
had always existed, he maintained, but they mingle with each other in various
proportions in such a way as to produce the familiar furniture of the world and
also the resident of the heavens.
4. Aristotle
praised Empedocles for having realized that a cosmological theory must not just
identify the elements of the universe, but must assign causes for the
development and intermingling of the elements to make the living and inanimate
compounds of the actual world.
5. Empedocles assigns this role to Love and Strife: Love combines the elements, and Strife forces them apart.a. At one time the roots grow to be one out of many, at another time they split to be many out of one.
b.
These things, he said, never cease their continual
interchange, now through love coming together into one, now carried apart from
each other by Strife’s hatred.
c.
Love and Strife are the picturesque ancestors of the
forces of attraction and repulsion which have figured in physical theory
throughout the ages.
2. For
Empedocles, history is a cycle in which sometimes Love is dominant, and
sometimes Strife.
a.
Under the influence of Love the elements combine
into a homogeneous, harmonious, and resplendent sphere, reminiscent of
Parmenides’ universe.
b.
Under the influence of Strife the elements separate out,
but when Love begins to regain the ground it had lost, all the different
species of living beings appear.
c.
All compound beings, such as animals and birds and fish,
are temporary creatures that come and go; only the elements are everlasting,
and only the cosmic cycle goes on forever.
Comments
Post a Comment